|
The United States and the Law of the Sea: Time to Ratify
What is Law of the Sea?
The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a set of rules for the use
of the world’s oceans, which cover 70 percent of the Earth’s surface. The
Convention was negotiated in 1982 to replace the 1958 High Seas Treaty, which
was out of date and unfavorable to America’s economy and security. UNCLOS came
into force in 1994, and to date, 152 countries have ratified the treaty. The
United States has not.
UNCLOS Functions
Its primary functions are to define maritime borders, protect the environment,
preserve freedom of navigation and establish clear guidelines for businesses
that depend on the sea for resources.
Necessary Changes to U.S. Law or Policy
In 1983, Ronald Reagan directed U.S. agencies to comply with all of the
provisions in UNCLOS except for Part XI, which concerns deep seabed mining. With
U.S. leadership, Part XI was reworked and the Convention was officially modified
by 1994, addressing all U.S. concerns. Since 1983, the U.S. has been in
voluntary compliance with the entire Convention and thus ratification would not
result in any changes to current U.S. domestic or foreign policy.
UNCLOS and the U.S. Senate
In 2004 all 18 members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted
unanimously in favor of UNCLOS. Although not a single Senator abstained or voted
against the treaty, then Majority Leader Frist never brought it to the floor for
a vote.
Why Ratify?
1. UNCLOS Helps Our Military -
The U.S. military, which relies heavily on its ability to navigate on and
fly freely over the sea, has been a strong advocate of UNCLOS. In the absence of
shared law, countries often make unreasonable and irresponsible claims on marine
territory to stop the U.S. military from defending U.S. interests. The U.S. has
tried to talk around these claims, but without a legal framework to support us
we risk compromising our intelligence and military operations at sea. Ratifying
UNCLOS will help us protect our military’s ability to freely navigate the
oceans.
2. UNCLOS Helps Us Protect The Environment - Oceans cover over 70 per cent of the Earth. In the U.S., we have laws to keep
marine resources available for future generations. UNCLOS sets a global standard
so that all countries are legally bound to protect the marine environment and
prevent pollution with as much care as the U.S. does. Joining UNCLOS would send
a message to the world that we care about the global environment; rejecting the
treaty would signal U.S. indifference to polluting nations around the globe.
3. UNCLOS Benefits American Business - Each country has exclusive rights to manage the resources in areas near its
coast. Under the terms of UNCLOS, which maps out the boundaries of these areas,
the American zone is larger than that of any country in the world. The size of
this zone is 3.36 million square miles – bigger than the lower 48 states
combined.
UNCLOS also opens up a world of possibilities to businesses who want to explore
resources beyond this exclusive area, in parts of the ocean that do not belong
to any nation. New technologies are being created that will allow companies to
explore and extract gas, oil and minerals from the deep seas. Businesses view
this possibility with excitement, but without any way to regulate their claims
to mining sites, it is too risky to attempt. Industry groups are lining up to
support UNCLOS because it establishes a credible mechanism to protect their
interests at sea.
Under UNCLOS, the five Arctic states — Norway, Denmark, Russia, Canada and the
U.S. — can lay claim to the Artic seabed, including mineral and oil extraction
rights, stretching 200 miles from the end of each country's continental shelf.
However, the U.S. hasn't ratified the Law of the Sea and therefore cannot claim
these extra rights over the seabed, raising the question: Will the U.S. miss out
on the world's last great land grab — the scramble for the Arctic?
4. We Can Do More As A Member Than As An Outsider - One benefit of membership is a permanent position on the International Seabed
Authority, an organization of countries set up to regulate deep sea mining. With
the world’s most powerful economy, the U.S. would have by far the most powerful
vote on the council – or none at all if we choose to reject UNCLOS.
Moreover, as of November 2004, members of UNCLOS have the right to modify the
treaty. As a member, the U.S. can use the treaty to seize new opportunities and
protect our interests. By contrast, if we choose not to join, we put in jeopardy
all of the provisions that U.S. negotiators worked tirelessly to negotiate into
the treaty over the last three decades. Without the U.S. at the table, countries
will be free to make changes to suit their own ends, perhaps at the expense of
the U.S.
5. Joining UNCLOS Sends A Positive Message About American Principles - The U.S. is a nation that values conviction, responsibility, and cooperation.
Ratifying UNCLOS tells the 152 countries that have already ratified the treaty,
including all of our allies, that we are committed partners in protecting the
planet and its people.
What U.S. Officials Are Saying About UNCLOS
| “As a matter of national security, economic
self-interest, and international leadership, the administration is strongly
committed to U.S. accession to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.” |
|
- President George W. Bush |
| |
| “The administration supports early
Senate action on the Convention.” |
|
- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice |
| |
| “The
Convention remains a top national security priority…It supports efforts in the
War on Terrorism by providing much-needed stability and operational maneuver
space, codifying essential navigational and overflight freedoms.” (2004) |
|
- General Richard Myers, former Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff |
| |
| “The Convention
supports U.S. efforts in the war on terrorism…while leaving unaffected
intelligence collection activities. Further threats will likely emerge in places
and ways that are not yet known. For these and other as yet unknown operational
challenges, we must be able to take maximum advantage of the established
navigational rights codified in the Law of the Sea Convention to get us to the
fight rapidly.” |
|
- Admiral Vern Clark, former Chief of Naval Operations |
| |
| “Opponents seem to think that if the U.S. declines to ratify the Law of the Sea,
it will evaporate into the ocean mists…Unlike some treaties…where U.S.
non-participation renders the treaty irrelevant or inoperable, the Law of the
Sea will continue to form the basis of maritime law regardless of whether or not
the U.S. is a party…My message…is that it is irresponsible for us to wait to
ratify the Law of the Sea until we feel the negative consequences of our absence
from the Convention. The Senate should ratify the Law of the Sea Convention now
in the interest of U.S. national security, the U.S. economy and the American
people.” (2005) |
|
- Senator Richard Lugar, Senate Foreign Relations Committee (R-IN) |
| |
| “The administration has submitted the Law of the Sea Treaty as one of its
priorities, and I support that.” (2004) |
|
- Ambassador John Bolton, former U.S.
Ambassador to the United Nations |
Other Supporters of UNCLOS
Business Organizations:
American Chemistry Council American Geological Institute American Geophysical Institute American Geophysical Union American Petroleum Institute AT&T Chamber of Shipping of America
International Association of Drilling Contractors National Marine Manufacturers Association
National Oceans Industries Association U.S. Tuna Foundation Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council
Military:
Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Vice Admiral Vern Clark, Chief of Naval Operations Navy League of the United States Naval Reserve Association
Environmental and Public Interest Organizations:
Center for International Environmental Law Environmental Defense Humane Society of the United States IUCN/World Conservation Union League of Conservation Voters National Environmental Trust Natural Resources Defense Council Ocean Conservancy Oceana Physicians for Social Responsibility Scenic America U.S. Public Interest Research Group World Wildlife Fund
Administration:
President George W. Bush President Bill Clinton Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Secretary of State Colin Powell All living State Department Legal Advisors
Legal and Research Organizations:
American Bar Association Council on Ocean Law Maritime Law Association of the United States Pew Oceans Commission Transportation Institute U.S. Arctic Research Commission U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy
Last Updated January 30, 2007
+ TAKE ACTION
|
|
Law of the Sea Resources
Citizens for Global Solutions Brief on
Myths and Facts about the Law of the Sea
Testimony of Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice on the Law of the
Sea
Citizens for Global Solutions
sign-on letter, placed in Roll Call, urging Sen. Frist to allow a
vote on ratification, May 12, 2004.
Citizens for Global Solutions Law of the
Sea Ad Running in Tennessee Newspapers
House Oceans Caucus letters to
Senator Frist and
Senator Daschle urging ratification, June 24, 2004.
Law of the Sea Convention: Should the U.S. Ratify? Brookings
Institution, June 22, 2004 (PDF).
Navy League
Presidential message calls Law of the Sea essential for U.S. Naval
Power
Official treaty website - Contains treaty text, status.
Interview with
Senator Richard Lugar
(R-IN) from Citizens for Global Solutions Spring 2004 Newsletter
Senator Lugar's
website on the treaty
Chatanooga
Times Editorial urging Sen. Frist to call for vote on ratification
(PDF)
|